Machine-learning classifiers, especially a multi-head attention model, correctly identify almost all free Z2, Z3, Z4, and Z2xZ2 quotients of CICYs on held-out manifolds, with only three missed Z2xZ2 cases.
Machine learning complete intersection Calabi-Yau 3-folds
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Gaussian process regression, kernel support vector regression, the random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and the generalized linear model algorithms are applied to data of complete intersection Calabi?Yau threefolds. It is shown that Gaussian process regression is the most suitable for learning the Hodge number h^(2,1)in terms of h^(1,1). The performance of this regression algorithm is such that the Pearson correlation coefficient for the validation set is R^2 = 0.9999999995 with a Root Mean Square Error RMSE = 0.0002895011. As for the calibration set, these two parameters are as follows: R^2 = 0.9999999994 and RMSE = 0.0002854348. The training error and the cross-validation error of this regression are 10^(-9) and 1.28 * 10^(-7), respectively. Learning the Hodge number h^(1,1)in terms of h^(2,1) yields R^2 = 1.000000 and RMSE = 7.395731 * 10^(-5) for the validation set of the Gaussian Process regression.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
hep-th 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Machine Learning Free Quotients of CICYs
Machine-learning classifiers, especially a multi-head attention model, correctly identify almost all free Z2, Z3, Z4, and Z2xZ2 quotients of CICYs on held-out manifolds, with only three missed Z2xZ2 cases.