Pith. sign in

GUARD-D-LLM: An LLM-Based Risk Assessment Engine for the Downstream uses of LLMs

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Amidst escalating concerns about the detriments inflicted by AI systems, risk management assumes paramount importance, notably for high-risk applications as demanded by the European Union AI Act. Guidelines provided by ISO and NIST aim to govern AI risk management; however, practical implementations remain scarce in scholarly works. Addressing this void, our research explores risks emanating from downstream uses of large language models (LLMs), synthesizing a taxonomy grounded in earlier research. Building upon this foundation, we introduce a novel LLM-based risk assessment engine (GUARD-D-LLM: Guided Understanding and Assessment for Risk Detection for Downstream use of LLMs) designed to pinpoint and rank threats relevant to specific use cases derived from text-based user inputs. Integrating thirty intelligent agents, this innovative approach identifies bespoke risks, gauges their severity, offers targeted suggestions for mitigation, and facilitates risk-aware development. The paper also documents the limitations of such an approach along with way forward suggestions to augment experts in such risk assessment thereby leveraging GUARD-D-LLM in identifying risks early on and enabling early mitigations. This paper and its associated code serve as a valuable resource for developers seeking to mitigate risks associated with LLM-based applications.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

A Survey on Human-Centric LLMs

cs.CL · 2024-11-20 · conditional · novelty 1.0

A review that sorts existing evidence on how well large language models imitate individual human skills and collective social dynamics into one taxonomy.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • A Survey on Human-Centric LLMs cs.CL · 2024-11-20 · conditional · none · ref 110 · internal anchor

    A review that sorts existing evidence on how well large language models imitate individual human skills and collective social dynamics into one taxonomy.