UCerF scores LLM fairness by both correctness and confidence, and SynthBias provides 31,756 gender-occupation coreference samples for benchmark testing.
Uncertainty-based Fairness Measures
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Unfair predictions of machine learning (ML) models impede their broad acceptance in real-world settings. Tackling this arduous challenge first necessitates defining what it means for an ML model to be fair. This has been addressed by the ML community with various measures of fairness that depend on the prediction outcomes of the ML models, either at the group level or the individual level. These fairness measures are limited in that they utilize point predictions, neglecting their variances, or uncertainties, making them susceptible to noise, missingness and shifts in data. In this paper, we first show that an ML model may appear to be fair with existing point-based fairness measures but biased against a demographic group in terms of prediction uncertainties. Then, we introduce new fairness measures based on different types of uncertainties, namely, aleatoric uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty. We demonstrate on many datasets that (i) our uncertainty-based measures are complementary to existing measures of fairness, and (ii) they provide more insights about the underlying issues leading to bias.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Is Your Model Fairly Certain? Uncertainty-Aware Fairness Evaluation for LLMs
UCerF scores LLM fairness by both correctness and confidence, and SynthBias provides 31,756 gender-occupation coreference samples for benchmark testing.