A review of supernova neutrino and DSNB physics, with a reproduced Bayesian figure from the author's prior work, but no new analysis.
Prospects for Distinguishing Supernova Models Using a Future Neutrino Signal
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The next Galactic core-collapse supernova (SN) should yield a large number of observed neutrinos. Using Bayesian techniques, we show that with an SN at a known distance up to 25 kpc, the neutrino events in a water Cherenkov detector similar to Super-Kamiokande (SK) could be used to distinguish between seven one-dimensional neutrino emission models assuming no flavor oscillations or the standard Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effect. Some of these models could still be differentiated with an SN at a known distance of 50 kpc. We also consider just the relative distributions of neutrino energy and arrival time predicted by the models and find that a detector like SK meets the requirement to distinguish between these distributions with an SN at an unknown distance up to $\sim 10$ kpc.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
astro-ph.SR 1years
2024 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
What shall we learn from a future supernova?
A review of supernova neutrino and DSNB physics, with a reproduced Bayesian figure from the author's prior work, but no new analysis.