In a 1,002-student biology course, AI feedback type did not affect midterm performance, while required confidence ratings and explanations were self-reported as the main driver of changed study behavior.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
How Adding Metacognitive Requirements in Support of AI Feedback in Practice Exams Transforms Student Learning Behaviors
In a 1,002-student biology course, AI feedback type did not affect midterm performance, while required confidence ratings and explanations were self-reported as the main driver of changed study behavior.