Proposes QTERM for quantum process learning, but the proof rests on an incorrect equality E[e^{γY}] = e^{γE[Y]} for measurement bits, invalidating the sample complexity and PAC claims.
Generalization and Robustness of the Tilted Empirical Risk
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The generalization error (risk) of a supervised statistical learning algorithm quantifies its prediction ability on previously unseen data. Inspired by exponential tilting, \citet{li2020tilted} proposed the {\it tilted empirical risk} (TER) as a non-linear risk metric for machine learning applications such as classification and regression problems. In this work, we examine the generalization error of the tilted empirical risk in the robustness regime under \textit{negative tilt}. Our first contribution is to provide uniform and information-theoretic bounds on the {\it tilted generalization error}, defined as the difference between the population risk and the tilted empirical risk, under negative tilt for unbounded loss function under bounded $(1+\epsilon)$-th moment of loss function for some $\epsilon\in(0,1]$ with a convergence rate of $O(n^{-\epsilon/(1+\epsilon)})$ where $n$ is the number of training samples, revealing a novel application for TER under no distribution shift. Secondly, we study the robustness of the tilted empirical risk with respect to noisy outliers at training time and provide theoretical guarantees under distribution shift for the tilted empirical risk. We empirically corroborate our findings in simple experimental setups where we evaluate our bounds to select the value of tilt in a data-driven manner.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
quant-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Quantum Learning with Tunable Loss Functions
Proposes QTERM for quantum process learning, but the proof rests on an incorrect equality E[e^{γY}] = e^{γE[Y]} for measurement bits, invalidating the sample complexity and PAC claims.