pith. sign in

The sorrows of a smooth digraph: the first hardness criterion for infinite directed graph-colouring problems

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Two major milestones on the road to the full complexity dichotomy for finite-domain constraint satisfaction problems were Bulatov's proof of the dichotomy for conservative templates, and the structural dichotomy for smooth digraphs of algebraic length 1 due to Barto, Kozik, and Niven. We lift the combined scenario to the infinite, and prove that any smooth digraph of algebraic length 1 pp-constructs, together with pairs of orbits of an oligomorphic subgroup of its automorphism group, every finite structure -- and hence its conservative graph-colouring problem is NP-hard -- unless the digraph has a pseudo-loop, i.e. an edge within an orbit. We thereby overcome, for the first time, previous obstacles to lifting structural results for digraphs in this context from finite to $\omega$-categorical structures; the strongest lifting results hitherto not going beyond a generalisation of the Hell-Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il theorem for undirected graphs. As a consequence, we obtain a new algebraic invariant of arbitrary $\omega$-categorical structures enriched by pairs of orbits which fail to pp-construct some finite structure.

fields

cs.LO 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

When Darwin met Ianus: dichotomies of expressivity

cs.LO · 2025-09-04 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Tractable temporal and phylogeny constraint languages have limited pp-interpretative power and admit 4-ary pseudo-Siggers polymorphisms, revealing a common core in their proofs.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • When Darwin met Ianus: dichotomies of expressivity cs.LO · 2025-09-04 · unverdicted · none · ref 16 · internal anchor

    Tractable temporal and phylogeny constraint languages have limited pp-interpretative power and admit 4-ary pseudo-Siggers polymorphisms, revealing a common core in their proofs.