In 17 LLMs from five families, the apparent scaling of concept steerability vanishes under normalized, held-out controls, while a decodable world map persists and other neuroscience parallels are measurement-dependent.
Number Representations in LLMs: A Computational Parallel to Human Perception
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Humans are believed to perceive numbers on a logarithmic mental number line, where smaller values are represented with greater resolution than larger ones. This cognitive bias, supported by neuroscience and behavioral studies, suggests that numerical magnitudes are processed in a sublinear fashion rather than on a uniform linear scale. Inspired by this hypothesis, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit a similar logarithmic-like structure in their internal numerical representations. By analyzing how numerical values are encoded across different layers of LLMs, we apply dimensionality reduction techniques such as PCA and PLS followed by geometric regression to uncover latent structures in the learned embeddings. Our findings reveal that the model's numerical representations exhibit sublinear spacing, with distances between values aligning with a logarithmic scale. This suggests that LLMs, much like humans, may encode numbers in a compressed, non-uniform manner.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
When Is a Steerable Concept Representation Real? Measurement Confounds in a Cross-Family Audit of Neuroscience Parallels in LLMs
In 17 LLMs from five families, the apparent scaling of concept steerability vanishes under normalized, held-out controls, while a decodable world map persists and other neuroscience parallels are measurement-dependent.