A small empirical study reports that bigram POS features with a CNN give higher author classification accuracy (59%) than unigram POS features with a feedforward network (44%), but the comparison is confounded and not statistically validated.
Quantifying and maximizing the information flux in recurrent neural networks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Free-running Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), especially probabilistic models, generate an ongoing information flux that can be quantified with the mutual information $I\left[\vec{x}(t),\vec{x}(t\!+\!1)\right]$ between subsequent system states $\vec{x}$. Although, former studies have shown that $I$ depends on the statistics of the network's connection weights, it is unclear (1) how to maximize $I$ systematically and (2) how to quantify the flux in large systems where computing the mutual information becomes intractable. Here, we address these questions using Boltzmann machines as model systems. We find that in networks with moderately strong connections, the mutual information $I$ is approximately a monotonic transformation of the root-mean-square averaged Pearson correlations between neuron-pairs, a quantity that can be efficiently computed even in large systems. Furthermore, evolutionary maximization of $I\left[\vec{x}(t),\vec{x}(t\!+\!1)\right]$ reveals a general design principle for the weight matrices enabling the systematic construction of systems with a high spontaneous information flux. Finally, we simultaneously maximize information flux and the mean period length of cyclic attractors in the state space of these dynamical networks. Our results are potentially useful for the construction of RNNs that serve as short-time memories or pattern generators.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Author-Specific Linguistic Patterns Unveiled: A Deep Learning Study on Word Class Distributions
A small empirical study reports that bigram POS features with a CNN give higher author classification accuracy (59%) than unigram POS features with a feedforward network (44%), but the comparison is confounded and not statistically validated.