Pith. sign in

Long-Term Fairness Inquiries and Pursuits in Machine Learning: A Survey of Notions, Methods, and Challenges

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The widespread integration of Machine Learning systems in daily life, particularly in high-stakes domains, has raised concerns about the fairness implications. While prior works have investigated static fairness measures, recent studies reveal that automated decision-making has long-term implications and that off-the-shelf fairness approaches may not serve the purpose of achieving long-term fairness. Additionally, the existence of feedback loops and the interaction between models and the environment introduces additional complexities that may deviate from the initial fairness goals. In this survey, we review existing literature on long-term fairness from different perspectives and present a taxonomy for long-term fairness studies. We highlight key challenges and consider future research directions, analyzing both current issues and potential further explorations.

citation-role summary

method 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.SE 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

method 1

polarities

use method 1

representative citing papers

A Taxonomy of Real-World Defeaters in Safety Assurance Cases

cs.SE · 2025-02-01 · conditional · novelty 4.0

A systematic review yields a seven-category taxonomy of defeaters in safety assurance cases: logical, contextual, evidence-validity, requirements, structural, adversarial, and uncertainty.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • A Taxonomy of Real-World Defeaters in Safety Assurance Cases cs.SE · 2025-02-01 · conditional · none · ref 32 · internal anchor

    A systematic review yields a seven-category taxonomy of defeaters in safety assurance cases: logical, contextual, evidence-validity, requirements, structural, adversarial, and uncertainty.