VGF solves behavior-regularized RL by transporting particles from a reference distribution to the value-induced optimal policy via discrete value-guided gradient flow.
Confronting reward model overoptimization with constrained rlhf
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
Introduces AIR, an asymmetric regularization that anchors open-ended safety prompts to verifiable ones via stop-gradient, improving invariance and accuracy when combined with group preference optimization.
MORA breaks the safety-helpfulness ceiling in LLMs by pre-sampling single-reward prompts and rewriting them to incorporate multi-dimensional intents, delivering 5-12.4% gains in sequential alignment and 4.6% overall improvement in simultaneous alignment.
Random sampling matches active preference learning on win-rate gains in online DPO yet both degrade benchmark performance, making active selection's overhead hard to justify.
citing papers explorer
-
Reinforcement Learning via Value Gradient Flow
VGF solves behavior-regularized RL by transporting particles from a reference distribution to the value-induced optimal policy via discrete value-guided gradient flow.
-
Towards Context-Invariant Safety Alignment for Large Language Models
Introduces AIR, an asymmetric regularization that anchors open-ended safety prompts to verifiable ones via stop-gradient, improving invariance and accuracy when combined with group preference optimization.
-
Explaining and Breaking the Safety-Helpfulness Ceiling via Preference Dimensional Expansion
MORA breaks the safety-helpfulness ceiling in LLMs by pre-sampling single-reward prompts and rewriting them to incorporate multi-dimensional intents, delivering 5-12.4% gains in sequential alignment and 4.6% overall improvement in simultaneous alignment.
-
Random Is Hard to Beat: Active Selection in online DPO with Modern LLMs
Random sampling matches active preference learning on win-rate gains in online DPO yet both degrade benchmark performance, making active selection's overhead hard to justify.