Pruning attention layers in five LLMs across eight datasets maintains accuracy but degrades faithfulness and calibration.
The Cost of Down-Scaling Language Models: Fact Recall Deteriorates before In-Context Learning
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
How does scaling the number of parameters in large language models (LLMs) affect their core capabilities? We study two natural scaling techniques -- weight pruning and simply training a smaller or larger model, which we refer to as dense scaling -- and their effects on two core capabilities of LLMs: (a) recalling facts presented during pre-training and (b) processing information presented in-context during inference. By curating a suite of tasks that help disentangle these two capabilities, we find a striking difference in how these two abilities evolve due to scaling. Reducing the model size by more than 30\% (via either scaling approach) significantly decreases the ability to recall facts seen in pre-training. Yet, a 60--70\% reduction largely preserves the various ways the model can process in-context information, ranging from retrieving answers from a long context to learning parameterized functions from in-context exemplars. The fact that both dense scaling and weight pruning exhibit this behavior suggests that scaling model size has an inherently disparate effect on fact recall and in-context learning.
years
2026 2representative citing papers
Knowledge graph triples capture 2-3x more attention per token than equivalent natural language due to structural patterns, compressing demonstration attention by up to 42% independent of semantic relevance.
citing papers explorer
-
Don't Go Breaking My LLM: The Impact of Pruning Attention Layers on Explanation Faithfulness and Confidence Calibration
Pruning attention layers in five LLMs across eight datasets maintains accuracy but degrades faithfulness and calibration.
-
The Structural Attention Tax: How Retrieval Format Hijacks In-Context Learning Independent of Content
Knowledge graph triples capture 2-3x more attention per token than equivalent natural language due to structural patterns, compressing demonstration attention by up to 42% independent of semantic relevance.