Analysis of 9,799 human-reviewed agentic PRs shows only 35.7% of rejections reflect clear agent failures, with 31.2% due to workflow constraints and 33.1% lacking clear rationale, plus notable interaction differences across agents.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.SE 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Reviewer bots' higher comment volume on AI agent PRs is associated with slower resolutions and poorer average feedback quality, while feedback quality itself has no association with PR outcomes.
citing papers explorer
-
Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
Analysis of 9,799 human-reviewed agentic PRs shows only 35.7% of rejections reflect clear agent failures, with 31.2% due to workflow constraints and 33.1% lacking clear rationale, plus notable interaction differences across agents.
-
On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
Reviewer bots' higher comment volume on AI agent PRs is associated with slower resolutions and poorer average feedback quality, while feedback quality itself has no association with PR outcomes.