ADS-based impact factors for 16 particle physics journals broadly track official Clarivate values, with PTEP and ARNPS inflated by single outlier papers.
How stable are the impact factors of major astrophysics journals
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We examine the long-term trends in impact factor over the past decade (2015-2014) for seven flagship journals widely used in Astrophysics: ApJ, AJ, ApJL, ApJS,A &A, JCAP, and MNRAS. We check the variation of both the traditional impact factor as well as the median-based impact factor, which we had studied in a previous work. We find that ApJS exhibits the largest drop in impact factor from 14.9 to 9.0, while ApJ and MNRAS show a steady decline from 6.7 to 5.2 and 5.6 to 5.0, respectively. However, the impact factors for AJ and ApJL have shown a steady increase from 4.55 to 5.35 and 6.4 to 9.7, respectively. The median-based impact factors are much more stable showing variations of at most $\pm 1$ within the last decade.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
hep-ex 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A meta-analysis of impact factors of particle physics journals using NASA/ADS
ADS-based impact factors for 16 particle physics journals broadly track official Clarivate values, with PTEP and ARNPS inflated by single outlier papers.