GPT-4o increases emotional lexicon and uses more questions and exclamations when asked to strengthen speeches, but follows a surface style rather than human-like persuasive argumentation.
Do Language Models Enjoy Their Own Stories? Prompting Large Language Models for Automatic Story Evaluation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Storytelling is an integral part of human experience and plays a crucial role in social interactions. Thus, Automatic Story Evaluation (ASE) and Generation (ASG) could benefit society in multiple ways, but they are challenging tasks which require high-level human abilities such as creativity, reasoning and deep understanding. Meanwhile, Large Language Models (LLM) now achieve state-of-the-art performance on many NLP tasks. In this paper, we study whether LLMs can be used as substitutes for human annotators for ASE. We perform an extensive analysis of the correlations between LLM ratings, other automatic measures, and human annotations, and we explore the influence of prompting on the results and the explainability of LLM behaviour. Most notably, we find that LLMs outperform current automatic measures for system-level evaluation but still struggle at providing satisfactory explanations for their answers.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Anatomy of Speech Persuasion: Linguistic Shifts in LLM-Modified Speeches
GPT-4o increases emotional lexicon and uses more questions and exclamations when asked to strengthen speeches, but follows a surface style rather than human-like persuasive argumentation.