Seven popular GUI visualisation tools poorly support Arabic/RTL (especially Eastern numerals and maps), forcing 11 practitioners into multi-tool labour, simpler charts, and language compromises that the authors frame as infrastructural power.
Beyond English: Centering Multilingualism in Data Visualization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Information visualization and natural language are intricately linked. However, the majority of research and relevant work in information and data visualization (and human-computer interaction) involve English-speaking populations as both researchers and participants, are published in English, and are presented predominantly at English-speaking venues. Although several solutions can be proposed such as translating English texts in visualization to other languages, there is little research that looks at the intersection of data visualization and different languages, and the implications that current visualization practices have on non-English speaking communities. In this position paper, we argue that linguistically diverse communities abound beyond the English-speaking world and offer a richness of experiences for the visualization research community to engage with. Through a case study of how two non-English languages interplay with data visualization reasoning in Madagascar, we describe how monolingualism in data visualization impacts the experiences of underrepresented populations and emphasize potential harm to these communities. Lastly, we raise several questions towards advocating for more inclusive visualization practices that center the diverse experiences of linguistically underrepresented populations.
fields
cs.HC 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Designing Within the Lines: Practitioners' Perspectives and Visualisation Tool Evaluation in the Arabic Context
Seven popular GUI visualisation tools poorly support Arabic/RTL (especially Eastern numerals and maps), forcing 11 practitioners into multi-tool labour, simpler charts, and language compromises that the authors frame as infrastructural power.