Fifth-graders' hopes and fears about generative AI reveal three expected roles (companion, collaborator, task automator) and a strong fear that using it for homework is high-risk behavior with academic and disciplinary consequences.
Children's Overtrust and Shifting Perspectives of Generative AI
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The capabilities of generative AI (genAI) have dramatically increased in recent times, and there are opportunities for children to leverage new features for personal and school-related endeavors. However, while the future of genAI is taking form, there remain potentially harmful limitations, such as generation of outputs with misinformation and bias. We ran a workshop study focused on ChatGPT to explore middle school girls' (N = 26) attitudes and reasoning about how genAI works. We focused on girls who are often disproportionately impacted by algorithmic bias. We found that: (1) middle school girls were initially overtrusting of genAI, (2) deliberate exposure to the limitations and mistakes of generative AI shifted this overtrust to disillusionment about genAI capabilities, though they were still optimistic for future possibilities of genAI, and (3) their ideas about school policy were nuanced. This work informs how children think about genAI like ChatGPT and its integration in learning settings.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
"If anybody finds out you are in BIG TROUBLE": Understanding Children's Hopes, Fears, and Evaluations of Generative AI
Fifth-graders' hopes and fears about generative AI reveal three expected roles (companion, collaborator, task automator) and a strong fear that using it for homework is high-risk behavior with academic and disciplinary consequences.