Pith. sign in

Equilibrium of Data Markets with Externality

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We model real-world data markets, where sellers post fixed prices and buyers are free to purchase from any set of sellers, as a simultaneous game. A key component here is the negative externality buyers induce on one another due to data purchases. Starting with a simple setting where buyers know their valuations a priori, we characterize both the existence and welfare properties of the pure Nash equilibrium in the presence of such externality. While the outcomes are bleak without any intervention, mirroring the limitations of current data markets, we prove that for a standard class of externality functions, platforms intervening through a transaction cost can lead to a pure equilibrium with strong welfare guarantees. We next consider a more realistic setting where buyers learn their valuations over time through market interactions. Our intervention is feasible here as well, and we consider learning algorithms to achieve low regret concerning both individual and cumulative utility metrics. Lastly, we analyze the promises of this intervention under a much richer externality model.

citation-role summary

other 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.GT 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

other 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Data Sharing with a Generative AI Competitor

cs.GT · 2025-05-18 · conditional · novelty 5.0

In a two-stage data-sharing game, the unique equilibrium is either that the firm shares just enough data to stop the platform buying expert data, or that the firm shares an amount that maximizes its payoff while the platform buys all expert data.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Data Sharing with a Generative AI Competitor cs.GT · 2025-05-18 · conditional · none · ref 20 · internal anchor

    In a two-stage data-sharing game, the unique equilibrium is either that the firm shares just enough data to stop the platform buying expert data, or that the firm shares an amount that maximizes its payoff while the platform buys all expert data.