Introduces MCP-TDP benchmark showing near-100% attack success on models like GPT-4o for tool description poisoning and proposes reactive self-correction defense.
Commercial llm agents are already vulnerable to simple yet dangerous attacks
7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
7
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 3
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 3polarities
background 3representative citing papers
OS-SPEAR is a new evaluation toolkit that tests 22 OS agents and identifies trade-offs between efficiency and safety or robustness.
LLM agents iteratively generate and optimize data processing strategies for fine-tuning, delivering over 80% win rates versus unprocessed data and 65% versus LLM-based AutoML baselines while cutting search time by up to 10x.
TRiSM-guided agentic workflows reduced RAG poisoning attack success from 31% to 10%, data-field injection from 42% to 25%, eliminated network injection, and raised report accuracy from 72.5% to 86.5% across five LLMs and 800 generations.
A survey that taxonomizes threats to agentic AI, reviews benchmarks and evaluation methods, discusses technical and governance defenses, and identifies open challenges.
A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.
A survey that maps risks along the agent workflow and consolidates metrics and benchmarks for safety, robustness, privacy, and security in agentic AI.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.