Introduces MCP-TDP benchmark showing near-100% attack success on models like GPT-4o for tool description poisoning and proposes reactive self-correction defense.
Commercial llm agents are already vulnerable to simple yet dangerous attacks
7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
7
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 3
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 3polarities
background 3representative citing papers
OS-SPEAR is a new evaluation toolkit that tests 22 OS agents and identifies trade-offs between efficiency and safety or robustness.
LLM agents iteratively generate and optimize data processing strategies for fine-tuning, delivering over 80% win rates versus unprocessed data and 65% versus LLM-based AutoML baselines while cutting search time by up to 10x.
TRiSM-guided agentic workflows reduced RAG poisoning attack success from 31% to 10%, data-field injection from 42% to 25%, eliminated network injection, and raised report accuracy from 72.5% to 86.5% across five LLMs and 800 generations.
A survey that taxonomizes threats to agentic AI, reviews benchmarks and evaluation methods, discusses technical and governance defenses, and identifies open challenges.
A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.
A survey that maps risks along the agent workflow and consolidates metrics and benchmarks for safety, robustness, privacy, and security in agentic AI.
citing papers explorer
-
Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
A survey that maps risks along the agent workflow and consolidates metrics and benchmarks for safety, robustness, privacy, and security in agentic AI.