A mixed-methods framework that elicits stakeholder preferences and steers LLMs to generate tailored summaries of health simulations, presented without empirical validation.
Evaluating and Improving Graph to Text Generation with Large Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense potential across various tasks. However, research for exploring and improving the capabilities of LLMs in interpreting graph structures remains limited. To address this gap, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of prompting current open-source LLMs on graph-to-text generation tasks. Although we explored the optimal prompting strategies and proposed a novel and effective diversity-difficulty-based few-shot sample selection method, we found that the improvements from tuning-free approaches were incremental, as LLMs struggle with planning on complex graphs, particularly those with a larger number of triplets. To further improve LLMs in planning with graph sequences and grounding in truth, we introduce a new graph-to-text dataset, PlanGTG, annotated with two sub-tasks: reordering and attribution. Through extensive automatic and human evaluations, we demonstrate significant improvements in the quality of generated text from both few-shot learning and fine-tuning perspectives using the PlanGTG dataset. Our study paves the way for new research directions in graph-to-text generation. PlanGTG datasets can be found in https://github.com/probe2/kg_text.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Towards Personalized Explanations for Health Simulations: A Mixed-Methods Framework for Stakeholder-Centric Summarization
A mixed-methods framework that elicits stakeholder preferences and steers LLMs to generate tailored summaries of health simulations, presented without empirical validation.