DESI BAO+CMB yielding a positive present-day deceleration parameter q0≈0.10 (vs SDSS's q0≈−0.22) is explained by DESI's higher lowest effective redshift (0.295 vs 0.15), not by new physics.
and Nesseris S.,Outliers in DESI BAO: robustness and cosmological implications, arXiv:2412.01740 [astro-ph.CO] (2024)
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We apply an Internal Robustness (iR) analysis to the recently released Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) baryon acoustic oscillations dataset. This approach examines combinations of data subsets through a fully Bayesian model comparison, aiming to identify potential outliers, subsets possibly influenced by systematic errors, or hints of new physics. Using this approach, we identify three data points at $z= 0.295,\,0.51,\,0.71$ as potential outliers. Excluding these points improves the internal robustness of the dataset by minimizing statistical anomalies and enables the recovery of $\Lambda$CDM predictions with a best-fit value of $w_0 = -1.050 \pm 0.128$ and $w_a = 0.208 \pm 0.546$. These results raise the intriguing question of whether the identified outliers signal the presence of systematics or point towards new physics.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Cosmographic Taylor and Padé models fitted to Pantheon+SH0ES+GRB+DESI BAO data yield redshift drift predictions compatible with ΛCDM and ω0ω1CDM at 1-2σ, with mock drift data tightening q0 and j0 bounds.
Both power-law and exponential f(G) models fit recent cosmological data better than standard ΛCDM according to information criteria, with the exponential model predicting a late-time return to deceleration.
citing papers explorer
-
Present Day Cosmic Acceleration from SDSS and DESI BAO: A Call for Finer Tomography of the DESI Bright Galaxy Survey
DESI BAO+CMB yielding a positive present-day deceleration parameter q0≈0.10 (vs SDSS's q0≈−0.22) is explained by DESI's higher lowest effective redshift (0.295 vs 0.15), not by new physics.
-
Mapping the redshift drift at various redshifts through cosmography
Cosmographic Taylor and Padé models fitted to Pantheon+SH0ES+GRB+DESI BAO data yield redshift drift predictions compatible with ΛCDM and ω0ω1CDM at 1-2σ, with mock drift data tightening q0 and j0 bounds.
-
Testing Gauss-Bonnet Gravity with DESI BAO Data
Both power-law and exponential f(G) models fit recent cosmological data better than standard ΛCDM according to information criteria, with the exponential model predicting a late-time return to deceleration.