Analysis of 9,799 human-reviewed agentic PRs shows only 35.7% of rejections reflect clear agent failures, with 31.2% due to workflow constraints and 33.1% lacking clear rationale, plus notable interaction differences across agents.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Recruiters perceive themselves as retaining agency over GenAI in hiring pipelines, yet GenAI invisibly architects core evaluation inputs, producing only marginal efficiency gains at the cost of deskilling.
DePRa shows that involving 200 everyday users in rating mobile app data access is feasible and can complement expert privacy evaluations.
citing papers explorer
-
Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
Analysis of 9,799 human-reviewed agentic PRs shows only 35.7% of rejections reflect clear agent failures, with 31.2% due to workflow constraints and 33.1% lacking clear rationale, plus notable interaction differences across agents.
-
Resume-ing Control: (Mis)Perceptions of Agency Around GenAI Use in Recruiting Workflows
Recruiters perceive themselves as retaining agency over GenAI in hiring pipelines, yet GenAI invisibly architects core evaluation inputs, producing only marginal efficiency gains at the cost of deskilling.
-
Listen to the Voices of Everyday Users: Democratizing Privacy Ratings for Sensitive Data Access in Mobile Apps
DePRa shows that involving 200 everyday users in rating mobile app data access is feasible and can complement expert privacy evaluations.