Pith. sign in

QED at Large: A Survey of Engineering of Formally Verified Software

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Development of formal proofs of correctness of programs can increase actual and perceived reliability and facilitate better understanding of program specifications and their underlying assumptions. Tools supporting such development have been available for over 40 years, but have only recently seen wide practical use. Projects based on construction of machine-checked formal proofs are now reaching an unprecedented scale, comparable to large software projects, which leads to new challenges in proof development and maintenance. Despite its increasing importance, the field of proof engineering is seldom considered in its own right; related theories, techniques, and tools span many fields and venues. This survey of the literature presents a holistic understanding of proof engineering for program correctness, covering impact in practice, foundations, proof automation, proof organization, and practical proof development.

fields

cs.PL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Automatic Goal Clone Detection in Rocq

cs.PL · 2025-04-27 · conditional · novelty 6.0

clone-finder detects alpha-equivalent proof goals in Rocq projects and estimates that real codebases hold an average of 27.73 such goal clones per project with a 5-line proof threshold.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Automatic Goal Clone Detection in Rocq cs.PL · 2025-04-27 · conditional · none · ref 22 · internal anchor

    clone-finder detects alpha-equivalent proof goals in Rocq projects and estimates that real codebases hold an average of 27.73 such goal clones per project with a 5-line proof threshold.