The authors create an 18,000-pair formal-verification dataset, evaluate ten LLMs on six subtasks in five languages, and find that 7-8B fine-tuned models match DeepSeek-R1-671B while also yielding mixed but positive transfer to related tasks.
BERT is not The Count: Learning to Match Mathematical Statements with Proofs
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We introduce a task consisting in matching a proof to a given mathematical statement. The task fits well within current research on Mathematical Information Retrieval and, more generally, mathematical article analysis (Mathematical Sciences, 2014). We present a dataset for the task (the MATcH dataset) consisting of over 180k statement-proof pairs extracted from modern mathematical research articles. We find this dataset highly representative of our task, as it consists of relatively new findings useful to mathematicians. We propose a bilinear similarity model and two decoding methods to match statements to proofs effectively. While the first decoding method matches a proof to a statement without being aware of other statements or proofs, the second method treats the task as a global matching problem. Through a symbol replacement procedure, we analyze the "insights" that pre-trained language models have in such mathematical article analysis and show that while these models perform well on this task with the best performing mean reciprocal rank of 73.7, they follow a relatively shallow symbolic analysis and matching to achieve that performance.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
From Informal to Formal -- Incorporating and Evaluating LLMs on Natural Language Requirements to Verifiable Formal Proofs
The authors create an 18,000-pair formal-verification dataset, evaluate ten LLMs on six subtasks in five languages, and find that 7-8B fine-tuned models match DeepSeek-R1-671B while also yielding mixed but positive transfer to related tasks.