Across three datasets, five language models, and six post-hoc attribution methods, explanation faithfulness, robustness, and complexity scores differ significantly between male and female inputs in a large majority of 5,040 tested configurations.
Attention Mechanisms Don't Learn Additive Models: Rethinking Feature Importance for Transformers
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We address the critical challenge of applying feature attribution methods to the transformer architecture, which dominates current applications in natural language processing and beyond. Traditional attribution methods to explainable AI (XAI) explicitly or implicitly rely on linear or additive surrogate models to quantify the impact of input features on a model's output. In this work, we formally prove an alarming incompatibility: transformers are structurally incapable of representing linear or additive surrogate models used for feature attribution, undermining the grounding of these conventional explanation methodologies. To address this discrepancy, we introduce the Softmax-Linked Additive Log Odds Model (SLALOM), a novel surrogate model specifically designed to align with the transformer framework. SLALOM demonstrates the capacity to deliver a range of insightful explanations with both synthetic and real-world datasets. We highlight SLALOM's unique efficiency-quality curve by showing that SLALOM can produce explanations with substantially higher fidelity than competing surrogate models or provide explanations of comparable quality at a fraction of their computational costs. We release code for SLALOM as an open-source project online at https://github.com/tleemann/slalom_explanations.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Gender Bias in Explainability: Investigating Performance Disparity in Post-hoc Methods
Across three datasets, five language models, and six post-hoc attribution methods, explanation faithfulness, robustness, and complexity scores differ significantly between male and female inputs in a large majority of 5,040 tested configurations.