A neural-network variational sampler with an evolutionary flip-and-select operator is proposed for spin models, but its theoretical upper-bound proof assumes uniform random candidates and does not apply to the actual sampling process.
Gumbel-softmax Optimization: A Simple General Framework for Combinatorial Optimization Problems on Graphs
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Many problems in real life can be converted to combinatorial optimization problems (COPs) on graphs, that is to find a best node state configuration or a network structure such that the designed objective function is optimized under some constraints. However, these problems are notorious for their hardness to solve because most of them are NP-hard or NP-complete. Although traditional general methods such as simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithms (GA) and so forth have been devised to these hard problems, their accuracy and time consumption are not satisfying in practice. In this work, we proposed a simple, fast, and general algorithm framework called Gumbel-softmax Optimization (GSO) for COPs. By introducing Gumbel-softmax technique which is developed in machine learning community, we can optimize the objective function directly by gradient descent algorithm regardless of the discrete nature of variables. We test our algorithm on four different problems including Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model, maximum independent set (MIS) problem, modularity optimization, and structural optimization problem. High-quality solutions can be obtained with much less time consuming compared to traditional approaches.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cond-mat.dis-nn 1years
2024 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Variational Evolutionary Network for Statistical Physics Systems
A neural-network variational sampler with an evolutionary flip-and-select operator is proposed for spin models, but its theoretical upper-bound proof assumes uniform random candidates and does not apply to the actual sampling process.