Post-training N:M activation pruning preserves generative performance in LLMs better than equivalent weight pruning, with the 8:16 pattern emerging as a practical hardware-friendly choice.
From 2:4 to 8:16 sparsity patterns in LLMs for Outliers and Weights with Variance Correction
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
As large language models (LLMs) grow in size, efficient compression techniques like quantization and sparsification are critical. While quantization maintains performance with reduced precision, structured sparsity methods, such as N:M sparsification, often fall short due to limited flexibility, and sensitivity to outlier weights. We explore 8:16 semi-structured sparsity, demonstrating its ability to surpass the Performance Threshold-where a compressed model matches the accuracy of its uncompressed or smaller counterpart under equivalent memory constraints. Compared to 2:4 sparsity, 8:16 offers greater flexibility with minimal storage overhead (0.875 vs. 0.75 bits/element). We also apply sparse structured patterns for salient weights, showing that structured sparsity for outliers is competitive with unstructured approaches leading to equivalent or better results. Finally, we demonstrate that simple techniques such as variance correction and SmoothQuant like weight equalization improve sparse models performance.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Motivating Next-Gen Accelerators with Flexible (N:M) Activation Sparsity via Benchmarking Lightweight Post-Training Sparsification Approaches
Post-training N:M activation pruning preserves generative performance in LLMs better than equivalent weight pruning, with the 8:16 pattern emerging as a practical hardware-friendly choice.