For crepant resolutions X(1,3,9) and X(1,3,13) the derived categories admit faithful braid twist group actions of types D and E induced by spherical object configurations.
McKay correspondence
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
abstract
This is a rough write-up of my lecture at Kinosaki and two lectures at RIMS workshops in Dec 1996, on work in progress that has not yet reached any really worthwhile conclusion, but contains lots of fun calculations. History of Vafa's formula, how the McKay correspondence for finite subgroups of SL(n,C) relates to mirror symmetry. The main aim is to give numerical examples of how the 2 McKay correspondences (1) representations of G <--> cohomology of resolution (2) conjugacy classes of G <--> homology must work, and to restate my 1992 Conjecture as a tautology, like cohomology or K-theory of projective space. Another aim is to give an introduction to Nakamura's results on the Hilbert scheme of G-clusters, following his preprints and his many helpful explanations. This is partly based on joint work with Y. Ito, and has benefited from encouragement and invaluable suggestions of S. Mukai.
fields
math.AG 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
The derived category D(X) of the crepant resolution X of the 1/7(1,2,4) singularity admits a faithful action by the braid group associated to a 3-cycle quiver.
citing papers explorer
-
Some faithful algebraic braid twist group actions for 3-fold crepant resolutions
For crepant resolutions X(1,3,9) and X(1,3,13) the derived categories admit faithful braid twist group actions of types D and E induced by spherical object configurations.
-
Quiver braid group action for a 3-fold crepant resolution
The derived category D(X) of the crepant resolution X of the 1/7(1,2,4) singularity admits a faithful action by the braid group associated to a 3-cycle quiver.