The paper defines intent-to-execution integrity as the conjunction of Tool Integrity, Instruction Integrity, Judgment Integrity, and Data Flow Integrity, arguing that existing LLM agent defenses provide only partial coverage of these properties.
SecAlign: Defending against prompt injection with preference optimization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CR 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Securing LLM Agents Need Intent-to-Execution Integrity
The paper defines intent-to-execution integrity as the conjunction of Tool Integrity, Instruction Integrity, Judgment Integrity, and Data Flow Integrity, arguing that existing LLM agent defenses provide only partial coverage of these properties.