CodeQL detected 171 CVEs total, with 83 caught by a prior version before the fix; detections were often actionable within the vulnerable file but not stable across tool versions.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
A custom LLM agent achieves 94% manually verified success on a new benchmark of 35 software analysis setups, outperforming baselines at 77%, but struggles with stage mixing, error localization, and overestimating its own success.
A game-theoretic heterogeneous multi-agent architecture with three cloud LLMs and a local verifier achieves 77.2% F1, 100% recall, and 3x speedup for code vulnerability detection at $0.002 per sample on the NIST Juliet suite.
Large-scale analysis of GitHub Actions reveals three failure response patterns, a positive link between usage intensity and lower failure rates, and a gap between config file presence and actual workflow activity.
citing papers explorer
-
Longitudinal Analyses of SAST Tools: A CodeQL Case Study
CodeQL detected 171 CVEs total, with 83 caught by a prior version before the fix; detections were often actionable within the vulnerable file but not stable across tool versions.
-
Evaluating LLM Agents on Automated Software Analysis Tasks
A custom LLM agent achieves 94% manually verified success on a new benchmark of 35 software analysis setups, outperforming baselines at 77%, but struggles with stage mixing, error localization, and overestimating its own success.
-
Strategic Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Architecture for Cost-Effective Code Vulnerability Detection
A game-theoretic heterogeneous multi-agent architecture with three cloud LLMs and a local verifier achieves 77.2% F1, 100% recall, and 3x speedup for code vulnerability detection at $0.002 per sample on the NIST Juliet suite.
-
Beyond the YAML File: Understanding Real-World GitHub Actions Workflow Adoption
Large-scale analysis of GitHub Actions reveals three failure response patterns, a positive link between usage intensity and lower failure rates, and a gap between config file presence and actual workflow activity.