Under fixed conditional-probe energy and fixed gain, optimized success-weighted photon subtraction, addition, and catalysis all give less Fisher information than the optimized Gaussian input in an SU(1,1) interferometer.
Quantum optical metrology in the lossy $SU(2)$ and $SU(1,1)$ interferometers
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We study the phase sensitivity in the conventional $SU(2)$ and nonconventional $SU(1,1)$ interferometers with the coherent and squeezed vacuum input state via the quantum Cramer-Rao bound. We explicitly construct the detection scheme that gives the optimal phase sensitivity. For practical purposes, we show that in the presence of photon loss, both interferometers with proper homodyne detections, are nearly optimal. We also find that unlike the coherent state and squeezed vacuum state, the effects of the imperfect detector on the phase sensitivity cannot be asymptotically removed for a generic coherent-squeezed state by increasing the amplifier gain of the OPA.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
quant-ph 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Heralded Non-Gaussian Squeezed-State Inputs for Parity-Detection SU(1,1) Interferometry
Under fixed conditional-probe energy and fixed gain, optimized success-weighted photon subtraction, addition, and catalysis all give less Fisher information than the optimized Gaussian input in an SU(1,1) interferometer.