LLMs extend, rather than replace, classical social science methods, with a proposed three-tier bias framework for LLM-augmented surveys.
Synthesizing Public Opinions with LLMs: Role Creation, Impacts, and the Future to eDemorcacy
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This paper investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to synthesize public opinion data, addressing challenges in traditional survey methods like declining response rates and non-response bias. We introduce a novel technique: role creation based on knowledge injection, a form of in-context learning that leverages RAG and specified personality profiles from the HEXACO model and demographic information, and uses that for dynamically generated prompts. This method allows LLMs to simulate diverse opinions more accurately than existing prompt engineering approaches. We compare our results with pre-trained models with standard few-shot prompts. Experiments using questions from the Cooperative Election Study (CES) demonstrate that our role-creation approach significantly improves the alignment of LLM-generated opinions with real-world human survey responses, increasing answer adherence. In addition, we discuss challenges, limitations and future research directions.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Recalibrating the Compass: Integrating Large Language Models into Classical Research Methods
LLMs extend, rather than replace, classical social science methods, with a proposed three-tier bias framework for LLM-augmented surveys.