A systematic review of 45 studies on Wikidata content gaps yields a gap typology and a nine-dimension framework for measuring missing or biased knowledge.
Measuring Social Bias in Knowledge Graph Embeddings
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
It has recently been shown that word embeddings encode social biases, with a harmful impact on downstream tasks. However, to this point there has been no similar work done in the field of graph embeddings. We present the first study on social bias in knowledge graph embeddings, and propose a new metric suitable for measuring such bias. We conduct experiments on Wikidata and Freebase, and show that, as with word embeddings, harmful social biases related to professions are encoded in the embeddings with respect to gender, religion, ethnicity and nationality. For example, graph embeddings encode the information that men are more likely to be bankers, and women more likely to be homekeepers. As graph embeddings become increasingly utilized, we suggest that it is important the existence of such biases are understood and steps taken to mitigate their impact.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Filling in the Blanks? A Systematic Review and Theoretical Conceptualisation for Measuring WikiData Content Gaps
A systematic review of 45 studies on Wikidata content gaps yields a gap typology and a nine-dimension framework for measuring missing or biased knowledge.