Stronger reasoning models in LLMs reduce behavioral negotiation by defaulting to authority outcomes in multi-agent settings, unlike structured scaffolds that enable concessions.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
When Reasoning Models Hurt Behavioral Simulation: A Solver-Sampler Mismatch in Multi-Agent LLM Negotiation
Stronger reasoning models in LLMs reduce behavioral negotiation by defaulting to authority outcomes in multi-agent settings, unlike structured scaffolds that enable concessions.