Acceptability of AI legal adjudication systematically tracks a two-factor interpersonal-versus-institutional dispute structure, modulated by emotional framing, prototypicality, gender, and AI-specific attitudes.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 119 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
119
external citations · OpenAlex
fields
cs.CY 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Psychological features of dispute content and public acceptance of AI in legal adjudication: evidence for systematic variation beyond individual differences
Acceptability of AI legal adjudication systematically tracks a two-factor interpersonal-versus-institutional dispute structure, modulated by emotional framing, prototypicality, gender, and AI-specific attitudes.