Pith. sign in

Best Practices in Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Active learning is particularly of interest for semantic segmentation, where annotations are costly. Previous academic studies focused on datasets that are already very diverse and where the model is trained in a supervised manner with a large annotation budget. In contrast, data collected in many driving scenarios is highly redundant, and most medical applications are subject to very constrained annotation budgets. This work investigates the various types of existing active learning methods for semantic segmentation under diverse conditions across three dimensions - data distribution w.r.t. different redundancy levels, integration of semi-supervised learning, and different labeling budgets. We find that these three underlying factors are decisive for the selection of the best active learning approach. As an outcome of our study, we provide a comprehensive usage guide to obtain the best performance for each case. We also propose an exemplary evaluation task for driving scenarios, where data has high redundancy, to showcase the practical implications of our research findings.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CV 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Learn 3D VQA Better with Active Selection and Reannotation

cs.CV · 2025-07-07 · conditional · novelty 5.0

An active learning loop with semantic-variance uncertainty selection and oracle reannotation improves 3D VQA training efficiency, but gains are small and validation tuning is a concern.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Learn 3D VQA Better with Active Selection and Reannotation cs.CV · 2025-07-07 · conditional · none · ref 21 · internal anchor

    An active learning loop with semantic-variance uncertainty selection and oracle reannotation improves 3D VQA training efficiency, but gains are small and validation tuning is a concern.