In a 50-participant study, LLM-generated requirements were rated more aligned on average than human expert documents, but the design gave the LLM a higher minimum feature count.
Systematizing requirements elicitation technique selection,
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Analysis of LLMs vs Human Experts in Requirements Engineering
In a 50-participant study, LLM-generated requirements were rated more aligned on average than human expert documents, but the design gave the LLM a higher minimum feature count.