RefNLI exposes a reference determinacy bias in NLI models that causes high false contradiction and entailment rates when verifying claims against retrieved evidence.
Entailed Between the Lines: Incorporating Implication into NLI
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Much of human communication depends on implication, conveying meaning beyond literal words to express a wider range of thoughts, intentions, and feelings. For models to better understand and facilitate human communication, they must be responsive to the text's implicit meaning. We focus on Natural Language Inference (NLI), a core tool for many language tasks, and find that state-of-the-art NLI models and datasets struggle to recognize a range of cases where entailment is implied, rather than explicit from the text. We formalize implied entailment as an extension of the NLI task and introduce the Implied NLI dataset (INLI) to help today's LLMs both recognize a broader variety of implied entailments and to distinguish between implicit and explicit entailment. We show how LLMs fine-tuned on INLI understand implied entailment and can generalize this understanding across datasets and domains.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On Reference (In-)Determinacy in Natural Language Inference
RefNLI exposes a reference determinacy bias in NLI models that causes high false contradiction and entailment rates when verifying claims against retrieved evidence.