Quasar X-ray and UV flux data are weak but consistent with BAO and H(z) data, and the joint data mildly favor closed spatial geometry and dynamical dark energy over flat LambdaCDM.
Spatial Curvature in Cosmology Revisited
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
It is necessary to make assumptions in order to derive models to be used for cosmological predictions and comparison with observational data. In particular, in standard cosmology the spatial curvature is assumed to be constant and zero (or at least very small). But there is, as yet, no fully independent constraint with an appropriate accuracy that gaurentees a value for the magnitude of the effective normalized spatial curvature $\Omega_{k}$ of less than approximately $0.01$. Moreover, a small non-zero measurement of $\Omega_{k}$ at such a level perhaps indicates that the assumptions in the standard model are not satisfied. It has also been increasingly emphasised that spatial curvature is, in general, evolving in relativistic cosmological models. We review the current situation, and conclude that the possibility of such a non-zero value of $\Omega_k$ should be taken seriously.
fields
astro-ph.CO 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Quasar X-ray and UV flux, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter measurement constraints on cosmological model parameters
Quasar X-ray and UV flux data are weak but consistent with BAO and H(z) data, and the joint data mildly favor closed spatial geometry and dynamical dark energy over flat LambdaCDM.