SetGo assesses and repairs metadata readiness of scientific AI datasets before publication, raising FAIR scores on four benchmark corpora from ~52–57% to ~81–91%.
Data Readiness Levels
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 14 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Application of models to data is fraught. Data-generating collaborators often only have a very basic understanding of the complications of collating, processing and curating data. Challenges include: poor data collection practices, missing values, inconvenient storage mechanisms, intellectual property, security and privacy. All these aspects obstruct the sharing and interconnection of data, and the eventual interpretation of data through machine learning or other approaches. In project reporting, a major challenge is in encapsulating these problems and enabling goals to be built around the processing of data. Project overruns can occur due to failure to account for the amount of time required to curate and collate. But to understand these failures we need to have a common language for assessing the readiness of a particular data set. This position paper proposes the use of data readiness levels: it gives a rough outline of three stages of data preparedness and speculates on how formalisation of these levels into a common language for data readiness could facilitate project management.
fields
cs.DL 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
SetGo: Metadata Readiness for Scientific AI Datasets
SetGo assesses and repairs metadata readiness of scientific AI datasets before publication, raising FAIR scores on four benchmark corpora from ~52–57% to ~81–91%.