pith. sign in

You still have to study on the security of LLM generated code,

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

fields

cs.CR 2

years

2026 2

representative citing papers

Understanding the (In)Security of Vibe-Coded Applications

cs.CR · 2026-06-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Empirical study of real-world vibe-coded apps finds recurring vulnerabilities like placeholder logic and secret exposure caused by AI agent limitations such as memory loss and insufficient security knowledge.

Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Based Secure Code Generation

cs.CR · 2026-05-22 · conditional · novelty 6.0

MA-CoT prompting reduces security findings in LLM-generated code by 57.6% on a 200-task dataset and 94.5% on LLMSecEval across C, Java, and Python, outperforming vanilla, zero-shot, and standard CoT strategies.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • Understanding the (In)Security of Vibe-Coded Applications cs.CR · 2026-06-22 · unverdicted · none · ref 29

    Empirical study of real-world vibe-coded apps finds recurring vulnerabilities like placeholder logic and secret exposure caused by AI agent limitations such as memory loss and insufficient security knowledge.

  • Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Based Secure Code Generation cs.CR · 2026-05-22 · conditional · none · ref 29

    MA-CoT prompting reduces security findings in LLM-generated code by 57.6% on a 200-task dataset and 94.5% on LLMSecEval across C, Java, and Python, outperforming vanilla, zero-shot, and standard CoT strategies.