EditPropBench evaluates LLM editors on propagating factual edits to dependent claims in synthetic scientific manuscripts, showing that even the strongest systems miss roughly 30% of required updates on hard cases.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
An online study of 70 students found that gender, race, and self-efficacy predict distinct ChatGPT query patterns during essay writing, with patterns linked to enjoyment and perceived ownership of the final essay.
citing papers explorer
-
EditPropBench: Measuring Factual Edit Propagation in Scientific Manuscripts
EditPropBench evaluates LLM editors on propagating factual edits to dependent claims in synthetic scientific manuscripts, showing that even the strongest systems miss roughly 30% of required updates on hard cases.
-
An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essays
An online study of 70 students found that gender, race, and self-efficacy predict distinct ChatGPT query patterns during essay writing, with patterns linked to enjoyment and perceived ownership of the final essay.