pith. sign in

Correctness criteria for complex Langevin

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it
abstract

The complex Langevin approach is a promising method for the numerical treatment of systems with a sign problem, for which conventional lattice field theory techniques based on importance sampling cannot be applied. However, complex Langevin dynamics may fail to converge in some cases and converge to a wrong limit in others, motivating the development of various diagnostic tools over the years to assess the correctness of given simulation results. This work aims at providing a systematic comparison between the most prominent such correctness criteria. In particular, the main goal is to contrast their applicability, ease of use, and - most importantly - their predictive power. To this end, four simple but nontrivial models are considered and the criteria applied to each of them. The obtained conclusions are expected to carry over to more realistic theories as well.

citation-role summary

method 2 background 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 3

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 3

representative citing papers

Lattice field theories with a sign problem

hep-lat · 2026-04-27 · unverdicted · novelty 1.0 · 2 refs

Reviews approaches such as Lefschetz thimbles, complex Langevin dynamics, dual variables, tensor renormalization group, and machine learning to control the sign problem in lattice field theories.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.