A six-dimension framework shows structural failures in four governance principles under radical capability asymmetry, with two requiring new normative theory and a pattern of interdependent breakdown.
Sandkühler, Stephen Thomas, Benjamin Weinstein-Raun, and Jan Brauner
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Cognitive Comparability and the Limits of Governance: Evaluating Authority Under Radical Capability Asymmetry
A six-dimension framework shows structural failures in four governance principles under radical capability asymmetry, with two requiring new normative theory and a pattern of interdependent breakdown.