Machines recover up to 53% of the crowd-highlight prediction headroom, and fusing five frontier models reaches about 60%, confirmed in a pre-registered replication.
Wisdom from Diversity: Bias Mitigation Through Hybrid Human-LLM Crowds
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Despite their performance, large language models (LLMs) can inadvertently perpetuate biases found in the data they are trained on. By analyzing LLM responses to bias-eliciting headlines, we find that these models often mirror human biases. To address this, we explore crowd-based strategies for mitigating bias through response aggregation. We first demonstrate that simply averaging responses from multiple LLMs, intended to leverage the "wisdom of the crowd", can exacerbate existing biases due to the limited diversity within LLM crowds. In contrast, we show that locally weighted aggregation methods more effectively leverage the wisdom of the LLM crowd, achieving both bias mitigation and improved accuracy. Finally, recognizing the complementary strengths of LLMs (accuracy) and humans (diversity), we demonstrate that hybrid crowds containing both significantly enhance performance and further reduce biases across ethnic and gender-related contexts.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.IR 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Floor, Ceiling, and the Fusion Gap: How Much of Crowd Reading Attention Can Machines Predict?
Machines recover up to 53% of the crowd-highlight prediction headroom, and fusing five frontier models reaches about 60%, confirmed in a pre-registered replication.