A position paper making the case that specialised, well-specified AI systems are more robust, secure, and governable than general-purpose AGI systems, and that hard-to-specify tasks need specified governance.
The poison of dimensionality
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This paper advances the understanding of how the size of a machine learning model affects its vulnerability to poisoning, despite state-of-the-art defenses. Given isotropic random honest feature vectors and the geometric median (or clipped mean) as the robust gradient aggregator rule, we essentially prove that, perhaps surprisingly, linear and logistic regressions with $D \geq 169 H^2/P^2$ parameters are subject to arbitrary model manipulation by poisoners, where $H$ and $P$ are the numbers of honestly labeled and poisoned data points used for training. Our experiments go on exposing a fundamental tradeoff between augmenting model expressivity and increasing the poisoners' attack surface, on both synthetic data, and on MNIST & FashionMNIST data for linear classifiers with random features. We also discuss potential implications for source-based learning and neural nets.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Case for Specialisation in Non-Human Entities
A position paper making the case that specialised, well-specified AI systems are more robust, secure, and governable than general-purpose AGI systems, and that hard-to-specify tasks need specified governance.