Pith. sign in

Pragmatic-Pedagogic Value Alignment

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

As intelligent systems gain autonomy and capability, it becomes vital to ensure that their objectives match those of their human users; this is known as the value-alignment problem. In robotics, value alignment is key to the design of collaborative robots that can integrate into human workflows, successfully inferring and adapting to their users' objectives as they go. We argue that a meaningful solution to value alignment must combine multi-agent decision theory with rich mathematical models of human cognition, enabling robots to tap into people's natural collaborative capabilities. We present a solution to the cooperative inverse reinforcement learning (CIRL) dynamic game based on well-established cognitive models of decision making and theory of mind. The solution captures a key reciprocity relation: the human will not plan her actions in isolation, but rather reason pedagogically about how the robot might learn from them; the robot, in turn, can anticipate this and interpret the human's actions pragmatically. To our knowledge, this work constitutes the first formal analysis of value alignment grounded in empirically validated cognitive models.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment

cs.AI · 2026-08-10 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A systematic annotation of 94 AI alignment papers shows the field largely equates human values with measurable preferences, rarely defines values, and is increasingly removing humans from alignment evaluation.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment cs.AI · 2026-08-10 · conditional · none · ref 95 · internal anchor

    A systematic annotation of 94 AI alignment papers shows the field largely equates human values with measurable preferences, rarely defines values, and is increasingly removing humans from alignment evaluation.