Binary groundedness judgments in AI evaluations should be replaced by a reader-centered taxonomy of support relations that distinguishes syntactic and interpretive moves between generated statements and source documents.
Attribution Gradients: Incrementally Unfolding Citations for Critical Examination of Attributed AI Answers
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
AI answer engines are a relatively new kind of information search tool: rather than returning a ranked list of documents, they generate an answer to a search question with inline citations to sources. But reading the cited sources is costly, and citation links themselves offer little guidance about what evidence they contain. We present attribution gradients, a technique to boost the informativeness of citations by consolidating scent and information prey in place. Its first feature is bringing evidence amounts, supporting/contradictory excerpts, links to source, contextual explanation into one place. Its second feature is the ability to unravel second-degree citations in place. In a lab study we demonstrate usage of the full gradient in a critical reading task and its support for deep engagement that increased the depth of what readers took away from the sources versus a standard citation and document QA design.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
From Binary Groundedness to Support Relations: Towards a Reader-Centred Taxonomy for Comprehension of AI Output
Binary groundedness judgments in AI evaluations should be replaced by a reader-centered taxonomy of support relations that distinguishes syntactic and interpretive moves between generated statements and source documents.