Empirical analysis of peer review data reveals that author promotional language correlates with reviewer novelty disagreement only for moderately innovative papers.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.DL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Examining the Cognitive Gap Between Authors and Peer Reviewers on Academic Paper Novelty
Empirical analysis of peer review data reveals that author promotional language correlates with reviewer novelty disagreement only for moderately innovative papers.